Nat Fortune

Nat Fortune commented on Keep In Touch 2012-06-20 08:21:29 -0400
Dear Chuck, thanks for checking. Your source is misinformed: we are one of three political parties in MA with major party ballot-access status. We are not a political designation. The 5% of the vote I received in my 2010 run for state auditor regained our major party status. We are small in numbers, but we are the only major party that is growing in registration. We’d welcome your help! —-Nat Fortune, Green-Rainbow Party treasurer.

Keep In Touch

We encourage your feedback and hope you'll continue keep in touch!

  • To email: office@green-rainbow.org
  • To mail by US mail: P.O. Box 87, N. Hatfield MA 01066
  • To call: (413) 650-6542
  • To get the latest news about our party, candidates and events, click on Subscribe above
  • To take a break from it all, click Unsubscribe above (but come back, we'll miss you!)
  • To send us your comments, use the Send Feedback box on this page
  • To share your suggestions (and get feedback from others), click on Suggest above
  • To spread the word to friends, click on Spread the Word above
  • To  join online email discussions of political issues and strategies by GRP members, subscribe to the GRP-discuss listserv.

Nat Fortune commented on agenda state committee 2012 06 23 2012-06-12 18:14:38 -0400 · Flag
we will add both to agenda — NF and DV

Nat Fortune commented on GRP Involvement in 2012 Ballot Question Campaigns 2012-06-12 10:14:52 -0400 · Flag
I support the GRP taking a position on at least some of the 4 ballot initiatives currently slated to appear this November. Rather than have the entire State Committee try to draft the exact language of particular flyers, I recommend that the State Committee instead determine “Yes/No/No Opinion” positions on each measure, then ask Platform and Communications to draft language and prepare materials. I recommend this in part b/c I am not happy with the present (partially drafted) proposed language — for example, I do not find that it would be persuasive to anyone who doesn’t already have a position on these particular measures — but I do not want this to preclude taking YES/NO/NO OPINION positions on each issue. If we remove the proposed language of the flyers from the proposal or split the proposal into two, one taking positions and the other a procedure to come up with supporting language, then I will co-sponsor.

Personally, I would recommend Yes on the Medical Marijuana (as it is in keeping with our already established policy positions) and No on usurping the authority of our elected School Committees to negotiate teacher evaluation policies. I would recommend ‘no opinion’ on the other two. That said, please note that intense negotiations are now underway regarding the teacher evaluation ballot measure, and it may be withdrawn if the legislature passes a compromise bill suitable to the measure’s sponsors.

Nat Fortune commented on Redefine regional convention districts 2012-06-10 13:58:54 -0400 · Flag
I will co-sponsor, butI believe the regions represented by appointed representatives (and those elected at regional convention) should match the regions represented by those elected in party presidential primaries. That means state senate districts, not US Congressional districts. This change would also help strengthen our electoral focus, and help lay the groundwork for candidates seeking MA legislative office.

2012_summer_meeting_proposals

Scroll down to review or submit proposals for the June 23rd meeting. Please use the following format (you can cut and paste): 

Proposal Header and Preamble

  • proposal title: short version
  • proposal sponsors (2 required, 1st serves as floor manager)
  • contact info for floor manager
  • committees to which proposal has been sent for review and feedback
  • explanatory background 
  • proposal summary
  • financial impact
  • implementation: who will do what, when, where and how? 

Proposal Language


Nat Fortune signed Liberty Mutual Tower Subsidy 2012-04-29 21:44:42 -0400

Revoke $46.5 M in Tax Giveaways for Construction of Liberty Mutual Office Tower

US_dollar_pyramid.pngTo: Mayor Thomas M. Menino, Boston City Councilors, Governor Deval Patrick and Legislators

Whereas: Mayor Menino and the Boston City Council have granted Liberty Mutual $24 million in property tax breaks and Governor Patrick has given Liberty Mutual $22.5 million in state subsidies to build a new office tower in Boston near its existing office in Boston.

Whereas: These subsidies are being granted to a corporation so wealthy that it testified to City Council that it could build the $300 million tower with cash on hand, and is on the Forbes 100 list, earning over a billion dollars a year in profit. 

Whereas: This subsidy money is being taken from essential city and state services including schools, libraries, parks, transit, youth jobs and community centers, even as their funding is being slashed. 

read the full petition text

237 signatures

We ask that the city and state revoke the $24 million in property tax breaks and $22.5 million in state subsidies granted to Liberty Mutual for the construction of a new office tower. Redirecting these funds to city and state services would make a real difference in people’s lives. 


Nat Fortune published Petitions in Take Action 2012-04-29 19:33:12 -0400

Petitions

Liberty Mutual Petition 

revoke $46.5 million in unnecessary tax breaks and subsidies; redirect funding to city and state services 

Whereas: The Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is building an office tower for its employees near its existing office building on Berkeley Street, and to subsidize this tower, Mayor Menino and the Boston City Council have granted Liberty Mutual $24 million in property tax relief and   Governor Deval Patrick has given Liberty Mutual $22.5 million in state subsidies in a so-called Tax Increment Financing (TIF) agreement.  

Whereas: These subsidies are being granted to a corporation so wealthy that it is on the Forbes 100 list, earning over a billion dollars a year in profit, and that testified to City Council that it did not even need to take out a construction loan, but could simply build the $300 million tower with cash on hand.

Whereas: This subsidy money is being taken from our city and state services – even as the funding for schools, libraries, parks, transit, community centers, youth jobs, and other essential services is being slashed.  

read remainder of petition...

click here to sign the petition

 

Better Budget Petition

Goal: a state budget and tax system that expands support for essential services while lowering taxes for those who need it most. 

To Governor Patrick and Massachusetts State Legislators: Every year sees additional cuts to health care, education, social services and the environment. Yet you continue to allow massive tax giveaways to corporations - giveaways which have proven ineffective and wasteful. And you have failed to rebalance a tax system that favors the rich, forcing low and middle-income people to pay higher effective tax rates than multi-millionaires. We deserve a Better Budget - one which funds all essential services through three key reforms:

• Eliminate unjustified, no-strings-attached tax subsidies for corporations. Pay for products & services, not for promises
• Implement a fairer tax system in which the poor and middle class get tax breaks and the wealthy pay their fair share
• Stop runaway health care costs by implementing single-payer insurance, an improved version of Medicare for all

sign the petition

 

 


Nat Fortune published Berkshire Greens Blog in Locals 2012-04-21 17:09:08 -0400

Nat Fortune published Pioneer Valley Green-Rainbow Local in Locals 2012-04-21 17:08:52 -0400

Nat Fortune commented on Working Committees 2012-04-21 13:30:12 -0400 · Flag
Thanks to Isabel Espinal of Communications for setting up these web pages!

← Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next →