[candidate-development] Allocation memo

[Yarden]

Dave,
Thank you.  I stand corrected and will desist from communications that  
are not to the
point.  If concerns with the process are genuinely concerns with the  
AdCom request,
itself, I do not see how we can address those in the CDLC decision- 
making.
Elie Yarden
MRGRA

On Apr 28, 2008, at 2:45 PM, DvEngland at aol.com wrote:

> Grace,
>
> The memo currently being circulated among CDLC is a response to the   
> Party
> Co-Chairs' request for a recalculation of the delegation following   
> the recent
> StateCom decision.  They did not refer the matter back to  us for  
> further
> discussion or tinkering.  If you think AdCom should ask us  to do  
> more, then we
> should get the request through that channel.
>
> I'm wary of opening up even a side discussion involving  what-ifs.   
> It seems
> to me we are past that.
>
> Since this is a consensus process, if you have concerns, please  
> state them
> as such and CDLC will try to address them.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> In a message dated 04/28/08 9:37:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com writes:
>
> Dave -  thanks for gettign this done - I am also glad to hear you  
> state tht
> you  are still hoping for concensus on this - to that end I want to  
> renew my
> request that a second set of figures be added that represent the  
> totals
> without
> Ball, Nader & Brown - and because there was discussion at  adcom about
> whether to
> reapportion the delegates by allocating them along  the same  
> percentages as
> the remaining options or to allocate them all to  No Preference  
> (this was
> when we
> were waiting to hear form Tassinari), I  think ideally we could use  
> seeing
> the
> figures both ways.
>
> You stated  in your email before this memo was posted the logic for  
> doing
> such
> re-allocation.   I know thisi s a bit of a pain but I don't have  the
> mathemethical grid and so am asking you and the other members of the
> allocation
> subcommittee to please do this.
>
> Thanks,  sorry for the extra work - Grace
> In a message dated 4/27/08 7:04:03 PM,  DvEngland at aol.com writes:
>
>
>> My apologies to the committee.   I have still not gotten used to  
>> being
>> unable
>> to send  Word documents to the list.  Thank you to everyone who   
>> alerted me
>
>> to
>> the omission.
>>
>> Mike has written me to  object and state he found my reference to   
>> him as
>> "saracastic,  hostile, and disrespectful."  I was trying to state   
>> that
> since
>> Mike's objections to Nader's being on the ballot have not  been   
>> addressed
> to
>> his
>> satisfaction in past discussions,  it was unlikely he would  find  
>> this
> latest
>> allocation something  he could support.  I presumed his  position,  
>> which I
>> shouldn't have, and I apologize.  I hope this doesn't  distract us   
>> from
> the
>> memo
>> itself.
>>
>> I still think  consensus is unlikely on this, but am eagerly  
>> willing to be
>> proved wrong.
>>
>> Meanwhile. attached is the memo in rich-text  format.  Please   
>> respond.
>>
>> Dave England,  Co-chair.
>>
>>
>>
>> **************Need a new ride?  Check out the largest site for U.S.  
>> used car
>> listings at AOL  Autos.
>> (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> candidate-development mailing list
>> candidate-development at green-rainbow.org
>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/candidate-development
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> **************
> Need a new ride? Check out the  largest site for U.S. used car
> listings at AOL Autos.
>
> (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
> _______________________________________________
> candidate-development  mailing  list
> candidate-development at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/candidate-development
>
>
>
>
> **************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S.  
> used car
> listings at AOL Autos.
> (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
> _______________________________________________
> candidate-development mailing list
> candidate-development at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/candidate-development