[candidate-development] Tassinari letter - 2nd attempt

[Nat Fortune]

On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Nathanael Fortune wrote:

Grace --- My reading of John's email is that he is speaking of  
Secretary Galvin, against whom we have run candidates in the past.  
Secretary Galvin might rightly bring up attempts by some Greens and  
Green-Rainbow party members --- including you --- to take votes away  
from voters following the primary as anti-democratic, and reason to  
think twice before voting to trust anyone in our party with the  
oversight of voting in this Commonwealth.

That said, your point that implying anyone in the Elections office is  
less that forthright and meticulous without anything to substantiate  
such a wild claim (and with plenty of evidence to the contrary) still  
stands. You should have thought about that  before enticing Kat Swift  
to submit a misinformed letter of complaint  to the Secretary that  
accuses the Secretary and his office of failure of duties.

Respectfully,

Nat Fortune



On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com wrote:

Please remember that these lists are public.

To my knowledge we have never had a reason to believe that Michelle  
Tassinari
has done her job in any way but meticulously.

Given that she and others could read this list, we need to not be  
implying
that she is not to be trusted unless we have a basis for that...

Thanks, Grace
In a message dated 3/5/08 4:56:39 AM, john.walsh at umassmed.edu writes:


> I hope we consider this proposal VERY carefully since I am not sure
> of all its implications.
> We must consider that this office is run by a Dem operative and that
> they can use anything we send against us in the future.