[candidate-development] Tassinari letter - 2nd attempt

[John Walsh]

De nada, Miguel.
jw

On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Mike Heichman wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks so much.
>
> I apologize for doubting your sincerity in the past.
>
> Mike
>
>
> John Walsh wrote:
>
>> Superb.  I agree with Mike that dirty tricks in the electoral  
>> process are one of the hallmarks on the duopoly.  Along with  
>> backroom deals to frustrate votes.
>> He (and Grace too) are to be commended for their stance against  
>> such ugly tactics.
>> john walsh
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Mike Heichman wrote:
>>
>>> I think that we are very fortunate that the media has not been  
>>> paying any attention to our party.
>>>
>>> I really do worry that a party that emphasizes that we would  
>>> bring election reform and clean elections to the people of the  
>>> Commonwealth are having a major problem in conducting a "clean  
>>> election" ourselves.
>>>
>>> Mike Heichman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nat Fortune wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Nathanael Fortune wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Grace --- My reading of John's email is that he is speaking of   
>>>> Secretary Galvin, against whom we have run candidates in the  
>>>> past.  Secretary Galvin might rightly bring up attempts by some  
>>>> Greens and  Green-Rainbow party members --- including you --- to  
>>>> take votes away  from voters following the primary as anti- 
>>>> democratic, and reason to  think twice before voting to trust  
>>>> anyone in our party with the  oversight of voting in this  
>>>> Commonwealth.
>>>>
>>>> That said, your point that implying anyone in the Elections  
>>>> office is  less that forthright and meticulous without anything  
>>>> to substantiate  such a wild claim (and with plenty of evidence  
>>>> to the contrary) still  stands. You should have thought about  
>>>> that  before enticing Kat Swift  to submit a misinformed letter  
>>>> of complaint  to the Secretary that  accuses the Secretary and  
>>>> his office of failure of duties.
>>>>
>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>
>>>> Nat Fortune
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com  
>>>> <mailto:Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please remember that these lists are public.
>>>>
>>>> To my knowledge we have never had a reason to believe that  
>>>> Michelle  Tassinari
>>>> has done her job in any way but meticulously.
>>>>
>>>> Given that she and others could read this list, we need to not  
>>>> be  implying
>>>> that she is not to be trusted unless we have a basis for that...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Grace
>>>> In a message dated 3/5/08 4:56:39 AM, john.walsh at umassmed.edu  
>>>> <mailto:john.walsh at umassmed.edu> writes:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I hope we consider this proposal VERY carefully since I am not  
>>>>> sure
>>>>> of all its implications.
>>>>> We must consider that this office is run by a Dem operative and  
>>>>> that
>>>>> they can use anything we send against us in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> candidate-development mailing list
>>>> candidate-development at green-rainbow.org <mailto:candidate- 
>>>> development at green-rainbow.org>
>>>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/candidate-development
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> John V. Walsh, MD
>> Professor of Physiology
>> University of Massachusetts Medical School
>> 508-856-3360 (Office)
>> 508-868-1653 (Cell)
>> john.walsh at umassmed.edu <mailto:john.walsh at umassmed.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

John V. Walsh, MD
Professor of Physiology
University of Massachusetts Medical School
508-856-3360 (Office)
508-868-1653 (Cell)
john.walsh at umassmed.edu