[candidate-development] [adcom] delegate allocation
Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com
Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com
Wed May 7 19:44:07 EDT 2008
Well, the statecom did not decide the allocation - since we reaffirmed our
pretty mangled Delegate Selection Plan - it clearly states that allocatin is
decided by CDLC and adcom not the statecom.
And Eli - however tired of this you are - I am surely AT LEAST as tired.
I agree BASTA - problem is I think it is absolutely clear that Brown, Ball
and Nader are not candidates and therefore cannot get delegates. And if you
considered them candidates at the time of the primary, they have certainly
released their delegates by announcing they are not seeking the Green Presidential
Nomination, they clearly at not now seeking delegates.
You want BASTA to mean the opposite.
and we are all on adcom.
So if we have to make a decision by email that is anything but concensus, we
have only one email decision-making process vetted and agreed to be the party
- and that takes three weeks. If someone wants to put out a proposal today.
I think a face-to-face meeting will be both more productive and take less
time.
And clearly, time lines are not in any way binding since we have not been
bound by any of the time lines in the Delegate Selection Plan to-date... so
lets just schedule when we can...
Yours, Grace
In a message dated 5/7/08 6:58:35 PM, gooberthink06 at yahoo.com writes:
> Whatever kind of meeting we have, I hope everyone will have by now
> carefully read the delegate selection plan and the minutes of the most recent State
> Committee meeting.
>
> Now ------------ I agree with Grace that we should take the delegates
> assigned to Nader, Ball, and Brown and divide them equally amongst the delegates
> who are actually still standing for party nomination.
>
> Others may or may not have other formulations in mind.
>
> The main question that I see is how whatever Adcom decides is going to be
> in sync with the decisions agreed upon and consensed at our recent State
> Committee meeting.
>
> In struggle,
>
> Gary Hicks
>
> Merelice <merelice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/7/08, Eli Beckerman wrote:
>
> > Can we schedule a face-to-face meeting but deal with the
> > delegate allocation now? We need to get the virtual StateCom
> > meeting to happen.
>
> This is my (and I hope others') current assumption. At this stage, the
> calculation is a technical matter that has followed defined criteria.
> As requested earlier, when I sent out CDLC's memo, please review the
> calculation and respond with your approvals and/or
> concerns/suggestions. The clock is ticking.
>
> Thanks,
> Merelice
> _______________________________________________
> AdCom mailing list
> AdCom at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/adcom
> To email Administration Committee members: adcom.members AT green-rainbow
> DOT org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it
> now.
> _______________________________________________
> AdCom mailing list
> AdCom at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/adcom
> To email Administration Committee members: adcom.members AT green-rainbow
> DOT org
>
>
**************
Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
More information about the candidate-development
mailing list