[Convention] Fwd: Re: [ComCom] Re: AdCom/ConvCom

david rolde davidrolde at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 30 22:17:25 EDT 2006



--- Mike Heichman <mikeheichman at verizon.net> wrote:

> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:07:10 -0400
> From: Mike Heichman <mikeheichman at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [ComCom] Re: AdCom/ConvCom
> To: "This is the Communication/Media working
> committee email list." <comcom at green-rainbow.org>
> CC: AbolishPoverty at aol.com, adcom at green-rainbow.org,
> 	convention at green-rainbow.org, Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> I do not have privileges for Adcom or the Convention
> e-mail lists and I 
> request that someone forward my message to these
> lists.
> 
> I have a major concern.
> 
> "We have met the enemy and it is us." (Pogo)
> 
> I don't believe that it is conscious but I believe
> that "sabotage" is a 
> common theme of our campaign. I know that sometimes
> I get in the way of 
> my (and our) best efforts. I'm fortunate that
> sometimes Grace and 
> Melissa are kind enough to point it out to me.
> 
> Case in point is the convention. We have a
> convention planning committee 
> that is taking the lead in planning the convention.
> However, the job of 
> getting as many people to the convention as we can
> is our collective 
> responsibility. We have had so many disagreements
> which is absolutely 
> fine. However, I'm concerned that we are spending so
> much energy 
> tripping over each other that we are practically
> paralyzed.
> 
> I don't know what the solution is to the details of
> how we move forward. 
> I'm willing to stand aside on how we move forward.
> 
> I would like to have more information (like a
> leaflet, postcard) that I 
> know is being worked on-ASAP-so I can send it to the
> members of the 
> Boston/JP e-mail list. Our chapter is meeting this
> Sunday--I'm hoping 
> that we will be given some phone calls to make. (I
> don't know how many 
> we will make, but we need the tools.)
> 
> I hope that we can get it together and do the best
> that we can to 
> mobilize a turnout for the convention.
> 
> Mike Heichman
> 
> 
> david rolde wrote:
> 
> >Dan, Paul & Lisa at the Convention Committee
> meeting
> >on Monday did agree that we can't mail out the 500
> >postcards. But I was there and did not agree. And
> >Grace has since then posted saying she thinks we
> can
> >mail out the 500 postcards. We have a standing
> Adcom
> >decision to mail out 500 postcards as soon as
> possible
> >to notify some people about the convention.  Only 3
> >out of 12 Adcom members have said they want to
> >overturn the decision. Grace has stated a proposal
> for
> >how the 500 names and addresses should be
> determined.
> >Who has access to these lists that Grace is talking
> >about and can go through them and see who we don't
> >have email addresses for? Is there someone who can
> >work on this this week? Paul's draft postcard
> seemed
> >fine and doesn't need much more work. 
> >
> >- David
> >
> >--- Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>I am not sure how the 500 was going to be selected
> >>but our email ists if we 
> >>use the announce list, the "supporters list" from
> >>Jill and Jamie's runs last 
> >>time, and an overlapping donors list includes
> >>thousands (although since they 
> >>overlap I don't know how many thousands).   a call
> >>toeach camapign requesting 
> >>that they make this notice a priority and getting
> a
> >>commitment should add many, 
> >>many hundreds more.
> >>
> >>This notice needs to be pretty exciting with a
> >>catchy subject line to get 
> >>through the email overload most people experience!
>  
> >>Maybe an evite like Jamie 
> >>did for our press conference announcing we re on
> the
> >>ballot.
> >>
> >>Also, just for clarity- the signature collector
> list
> >>belongs to the whole 
> >>slate.
> >>
> >>Then whoever was going to go through to id the 500
> >>list maybe could review 
> >>all these lists and see who on them is listed
> >>without an email and mail to those 
> >>people.   
> >>
> >>Just a suggestion, Grace
> >>In a message dated 8/30/06 12:07:55 AM,
> >>AbolishPoverty at aol.com writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>In a message dated 8/29/06 12:41:56 PM,
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>paulmushrush at gmail.com writes:
> >>    
> >>
> >>><<
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You'd agreed, last night, to notify AdCom of our
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>decission
> >>    
> >>
> >>>to change their plan to send a postcard to a
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>select group
> >>    
> >>
> >>>of 500 members. Well, I'm working on the ConvCom
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>minutes
> >>    
> >>
> >>>right now, and I'll be happy to send the
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>postcard/email section
> >>    
> >>
> >>>to AdCom. See it, cop-n-pasted below.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Let me know if you'll be doing this, or you'd
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>rather I do it.
> >>    
> >>
> >>>thanx!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>
> >>>Paul
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>paulmushrush at gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>978.413.1152
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>*Notification:*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Convention Planning Committee members, excluding
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>David, arrived at an
> >>    
> >>
> >>>agreement that the AdCom decision to mail out 500
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>postcards to more active
> >>    
> >>
> >>>members of the MGRP listservs is faulty. As Dan
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>pointed out, and Lisa and
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Paul agreed to, sending a postcard to a
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>subjectively selected list of 500 *
> >>    
> >>
> >>>active* members would most likely be repeating a
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>more affordable email
> >>    
> >>
> >>>announcement, which all of these individuals
> would
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>likely receive if it were
> >>    
> >>
> >>>just announced through email. Dan stated that
> this
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>selection of individuals
> >>    
> >>
> >>>will prove to be a rather elitist action, and
> that
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>an announcement mailed to
> >>    
> >>
> >>>some members ought to be mailed to all. Having
> not
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>attended the August AdCom
> >>    
> >>
> >>>meeting, Dan does not know how an arbitrary
> number
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>of 500 was ever decided
> >>    
> >>
> >>>upon. David voiced serious concerns with this
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>ConvCom discussion, and said
> >>    
> >>
> >>>that we must comply with decisions made by AdCom.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>If we are to send out an email message to all
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>listserv recipients and
> >>    
> >>
> >>>everybody active in the party, the following
> lists
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>should be included:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Â Â  - MGRP lisrsevs
> >>>
> >>>Â Â  - All campaign volunteers
> >>>
> >>>Â Â  - Patrick Keaney's list of petition
> gatherers
> >>>
> >>>Â Â  - MGRPAnnouncement email listservs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Dan will compose this email announcement message.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>We all agreed that in addition to sending email,
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>phonebanking should quickly
> >>    
> >>
> >>>be conducted/ [Dan Kontoff joined us briefly, by
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>phone, and agreed to
> >>    
> >>
> >>>coordinate phonebanking efforts.] >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Return-Path: <paulmushrush at gmail.com>
> >>>Received: from  rly-yc03.mail.aol.com
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>(rly-yc03.mail.aol.com 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>[172.18.205.146]) by air-yc02.mail.aol.com
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>(v112.5) with ESMTP id MAILINYC21-1c944f46e092c3; 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:41:53 -0400
> >>>Received: from  nf-out-0910.google.com
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>(nf-out-0910.google.com 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>[64.233.182.184]) by rly-yc03.mail.aol.com
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>(v112.5) with ESMTP id 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>MAILRELAYINYC37-1c944f46e092c3; Tue, 29 Aug 2006
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>12:40:41 -0400
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>c31so246829nfb
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Â  Â  Â  Â  for <AbolishPoverty at aol.com>; Tue, 29
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Aug 2006 09:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
> >>>Â  Â  Â  Â  s=beta; d=gmail.com;
> >>>Â  Â  Â  Â  
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
>
>h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
> >  
> >
> >>>Â  Â  Â  Â  b=Cm84y53Tf
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
>
>Jrldjw477suam1uA5KFxFSX4/hdekcKa5pTmZaoBbuLYQYhErEKxnO0SnXM8Uosk/1A/KFm47Ai1WI1CIjg4cEq3CnytIzRjyoZP+/Cn78qVA4J8nzu9ZjJg5tneCwhndA96A2V
> >  
> >
> >>>Ob72fA3bM/O74/iFH6jHbDIt9k8=
> >>>Received: by 10.49.10.3 with SMTP id
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>n3mr1377030nfi;
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Â  Â  Â  Â  Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
> >>>Received: by 10.49.12.13 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Aug
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>2006 09:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Message-ID:
> >>>      
> >>>
>
><e84acd4e0608290940j18efc290vfe7fe80647c84cd at mail.gmail.com>
> >  
> >
> >>>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:40:41 -0400
> >>>From: "Paul Mushrush" <paulmushrush at gmail.com>
> >>>To: Lisa-Richards-GRP-ExpCom
> >>>      
> >>>
> >><AbolishPoverty at aol.com>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Subject: AdCom/ConvCom
> >>>MIME-Version: 1.0
> >>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >>>Â  Â 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>boundary="----=_Part_13557_22236277.1156869641022"
> >>    
> >>
> >>>X-AOL-IP: 64.233.182.184
> >>>X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Lisa,
> >>>
> >>>You'd agreed, last night, to notify AdCom of our
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>decission
> >>    
> >>
> >>>to change their plan to send a postcard to a
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>select group
> >>    
> >>
> >>>of 500 members. Well, I'm working on the ConvCom
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>minutes
> >>    
> >>
> >>>right now, and I'll be happy to send the
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>postcard/email section
> >>    
> >>
> >>>to AdCom. See it, cop-n-pasted below.
> >>>
> >>>Let me know if you'll be doing this, or you'd
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>rather I do it.
> >>    
> >>
> >>>thanx!
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Paul
> >>>
> >>>paulmushrush at gmail.com
> >>>978.413.1152
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Notification:
> >>> Convention Planning Committee members, excluding
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>David, arrived at an 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>agreement that the AdCom decision to mail out 500
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>postcards to more active members 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>of the MGRP listservs is faulty. As Dan pointed
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>out, and Lisa and Paul 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>agreed to, sending a postcard to a subjectively
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>selected list of 500 active 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>members would most likely be repeating a more
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>affordable email announcement, which 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>all of these individuals would likely receive if
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>it were just announced 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>through email. Dan stated that this selection of
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>individuals will prove to be a 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>rather elitist action, and that an announcement
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>mailed to some members ought to 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>be mailed to all. Having not attended the August
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>AdCom meeting, Dan does not 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>know how an arbitrary number of 500 was ever
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>decided upon. David voiced 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>serious concerns with this ConvCom discussion,
> and
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>said that we must comply with 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>decisions made by AdCom.
> >>> Â 
> >>> If we are to send out an email message to all
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>listserv recipients and 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>everybody active in the party, the following
> lists
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>should be included:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>     •      MGRP lisrsevs
> >>>     •     All campaign volunteers
> >>>     •     Patrick Keaney's list of petition
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>gatherers
> >>    
> >>
> >>>     •     MGRPAnnouncement email listservs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dan will compose this email announcement
> message.
> >>> Â 
> >>> We all agreed that in addition to sending email,
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>phonebanking should 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>quickly be conducted/ [Dan Kontoff joined us
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>briefly, by phone, and agreed to 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>coordinate phonebanking efforts.]
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> >http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >_______________________________________________
> >ComCom mailing list
> >ComCom at green-rainbow.org
>
>http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/comcom
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ComCom mailing list
> ComCom at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/comcom
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the Convention mailing list