[Green-Rainbow] Re: Discussion of IRV--clarification

[Vincent Rocchio]

My aren't we the important person.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Merelice at aol.com>
To: <vfrocchio at earthlink.net>; <gogreens at attbi.com>
Cc: <chuck.turner at ci.boston.ma.us>; <connie at netway.com>;
<Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com>; <Green-Rainbow at massgreens.org>;
<horacesmall at yahoo.com>; <JenningsL at aol.com>; <KathyBTC at aol.com>;
<massgreens at igc.org>; <mhking at mit.edu>; <office at massgreens.org>;
<pkeaney at netway.com>; <richardcranford at earthlink.net>; <zisk at bu.edu>;
<dkesh at channel1.com>; <isis at isisdesign.com>; <greengil at attbi.com>;
<garyhicks1946 at hotmail.com>; <adam_artist at yahoo.com>; <jandrews at ll.mit.edu>;
<jstein at massmed.org>; <cd.johnson at verizon.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Green-Rainbow] Re: Discussion of IRV--clarification


> I don't know how I got in the middle of this email exchange, but please,
> guys, have some respect for those of us who are swamped with email and
don't
> need lots of extraneous chitchat.
>
> As long as I'm responding, however....
>
> 1) As one who has made a living for the last 25 years doing marketing and
> communications, this is no way to go about developing an effective ad
> campaign (which I gather is what this is all about). And if you really
want
> to protect your ideas from plagiarism, don't send them out on email.
>
> 2) If we are trying to win support for IRV, I suggest we run an ad that
> appeals to people and doesn't make them vomit. Besides, as good Greens, we
> should take that sandwich and turn it into fertilizer! :-)
>
> 3) If anyone on this list is serious about convening a genuine marketing
> committee, feel free to be in touch with me. Until then,  please get me
(and
> I suspect I speak for most of the rest of the folks) OFF this list!
>
> Thanks, Merelice