[Needtoknow] Re: [8cdpp] 88 promise to fund only withdrawal] Not
Capuano!
John Walsh
jvwalshmd at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 21:32:24 EDT 2007
Shelagh.
With all due respect, this letter is a lot of crap.
We all know that the signers are only shadow boxing here.
I am sure that you mean well, but like many others you are confining
the peace movement to the dead end of the Dem Party.
That is very disappointing to me - but so long as Peace (sic) Action
sticks with the Dems this way and does not build an alternative
political movement it is (sadly) part of a very big problem and not
part of a solution.
Rest well,
john walsh
On 10/10/07, Shelagh Foreman <shelagh at masspeaceaction.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Capuano is the only member of our delegation not to sign the letter.
> Please let him know how important it is to us.
>
> Shelagh
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Ufpj-congress] 88 promise to fund only withdrawal
> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:21:35 -0400
> From: sue udry <sue at unitedforpeace.org>
> To: ufpj-congress at lists.mayfirst.org, "UFPJ legislative discussion
> list" <ufpj-legislative at lists.mayfirst.org>,
> ufpj-leg-action at lists.mayfirst.org
>
> We're up to 88 signers on the 'only fund withdrawal' letter -- today
> Rep. Tubbs-Jones and Rep. Neal added their names. The letter has been
> altered slightly to reflect the increase in Bush's Iraq funding
> request. It now includes this paragraph:
>
> Now you are requesting an additional $45 billion to sustain your
> escalation of U.S. military operations in Iraq through next April, on
> top of the $145 billion you requested for military operations during
> FY08 in Iraq and Afghanistan. Accordingly, even more of us are writing
> anew to underscore our opposition to appropriating _any_ additional
> funds for U.S. military operations in Iraq other than a time-bound, safe
> redeployment as stipulated above.
>
> The complete letter is here
> <http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=2929>
>
> */One more push is needed on these targets:/*
>
> Members of the Progressive Caucus who haven't signed on:
>
> Senator Bernie Sanders, Rep. Mazie Hirono, Rep. Xavier Becerra, Rep.
> Madeline Bordallo, Rep.Robert Brady, Rep. Michael Capuano, Rep. Rosa
> DeLauro*, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, Rep. Tom
> Lantos, Rep. George Miller, Rep. Jose Serrano*, Rep. Louise Slaughter,
> Rep. Tom Udall,
>
> Members of the Out of Iraq Caucus who havent' signed on:
>
> Rep. William Jefferson, Rep. John Larson, Rep. Michael McNulty*, Rep.
> Nick Rahall, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard
>
> Others who have indicated interest, but not yet signed on:
>
> Kennedy (R.I.), Langevin, Van Hollen, Hooley
>
> *If any of these Representatives belong to you -- Please give them a
> call this week! They will send the letter to Bush on Friday*
>
> Here is a survey to bolster your case:
>
> Press Release
> *For Immediate Release*
> 10/10/07
>
> *Poll: Americans Reject Unconditional Iraq Funding, Support Congress
> Using Funds to Redeploy Troops *
>
> (Washington, DC) - On Wednesday morning, the fifth anniversary of the
> House vote to authorize military force against Iraq, Congresswoman
> Barbara Lee (D-CA) held a press conference on Capitol Hill to release
> the results of a new national poll that shows the American people are
> strongly opposed to the status quo in Iraq. The poll results not only
> show strong opposition to Congress providing further Iraq funding
> without conditions, but also broad support for Congress acting to end
> the Bush administration's policy in Iraq by providing the funding
> necessary for the redeployment of U.S. troops from Iraq. She was joined
> by a number of the 86 members of Congress who have signed onto a letter
> to President Bush, circulated by Lee and Representatives Lynn Woolsey
> (D-CA) and Maxine Waters (D-CA), stating that they will only vote for
> Iraq-related funding to protect US troops and bring them home.
>
> "Five years ago today, over the strong objections of many of those
> present, Congress voted to authorize this war. We are here today to say
> not only that Congress has the power to end it, but that the American
> people support us doing so," said Lee. "The President wants to pretend
> that Congress' only choice is to provide the funds he has requested
> unconditionally or 'cut off funding for our troops.' That's just not
> true. We can use our constitutionally mandated appropriations power to
> end his failed policy, to protect our troops and to bring them home. We
> have the power to fully fund redeployment, and that is what we must do."
>
> Asked what Congress should do with President Bush's pending Iraq
> supplemental request, the poll found that 70 percent of respondents want
> Congress to either vote against the request or to require that funds can
> only be used to protect troops and bring them home, and that by a two to
> one margin respondents favored requiring funds be spent on redeployment
> over providing the administration funds without conditions.
>
> Specifically, the poll asked respondents "President Bush wants Congress
> to approve a $200 billion dollar request to continue funding the Iraq
> war and keep the troops in Iraq. Should Congress: (read and rotate)
> vote _against_ the $200 billion funding request; vote _for_ the $200
> billion funding request without conditions; or vote _for_ the $200
> billion funding request, but specify that it can be used ONLY to protect
> US troops and contractors and bring them home, rather than to continue
> the war."
>
> Twenty four percent of respondents supported voting against the funding,
> 22 percent supported unconditional funding and 46 percent supported
> providing funding only for redeployment (eight percent responded "don't
> know"). Results were similar among registered voters: 22 percent
> supported voting against the funds, 23 percent supported unconditional
> funding and 47 percent supported providing funds only for redeployment
> (seven percent responded "don't know").
>
> The poll, which reached 1,000 adults and 796 registered voters
> nationwide between September 20-23, was designed by Lake Research
> Partners and administered by Caravan as part of an omnibus telephone
> survey. The margin of error for the full sample of adults is +/- 3.1%
> and +/- 3.5% among registered voters. It was commissioned by
> OneVoicePac.org, Congresswoman Barbara Lee's leadership PAC.
>
> --
> Sue Udry
> Legislative Action Coordinator
> United for Peace and Justice
> 301-565-4050 x315
> visit our website: http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=3116
> support our work: http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=160
> <http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=160>
> join one of our Legislative listserves:
> either announcements only (2-3 emails/week):
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ufpj-leg-action
> <https://lists.mayfirst.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ufpj-leg-action>
> or the discussion listserve:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ufpj-legislative
>
> 1100 Wayne Ave. #1020
> Silver Spring, MD 20910
>
> __._,_.___
> Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
> Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar
> Visit the 8CDPP blog at http://8cdpp.blogspot.com/
>
> Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format
> to Traditional
> Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
>
> Visit Your Group
>
>
> Green Groups
>
> on Yahoo! Groups
>
> share your passion
>
> for the planet.
>
> Beauty Groups
>
> on Yahoo! Groups
>
> A great place to
>
> connect and share.
>
> Yahoo! Groups
>
> Real Food Group
>
> Share recipes
>
> and favorite meals.
> .
> __,_._,___
> _______________________________________________
> Ufpj-congress mailing list
>
> Post: Ufpj-congress at lists.mayfirst.org
> List info:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ufpj-congress
>
> To Unsubscribe
> Send email to:
> Ufpj-congress-unsubscribe at lists.mayfirst.org
> Or visit:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ufpj-congress/shelagh%40masspeaceaction.org
>
> You are subscribed as: shelagh at masspeaceaction.org
>
>
>
More information about the NeedToKnow
mailing list