[Platform] ABWG Telecon - 9pm Tuesday
Mike Heichman
mikeheichman at verizon.net
Sun May 11 12:26:07 EDT 2008
John Andrews wrote:
>
> Hello, ABWG.
>
> I set up our telecon for Tuesday. Here is the call-in info:
>
> ADVISORY BALLOT WORKING GROUP TELECON
> Date : Tuesday, May 13, 2008
> Start Time : 9:00 PM EDT
> Duration: 1 hour
> Dial-in Number: 1-605-475-4150 (Midwest)
> Participant Access Code : 83086#
>
> Haven't put together an agenda yet - let me know if you have any
> suggestions. I'm hoping we can put our stamp of approval on the
> Secure Green Futures question. Maybe the IRV question if Dave England
> has time to submit it to us. The health care people seem to be very
> near having a final text. Not sure about the predatory lending
> question - hopefully someone can report on that. I've requested that
> a listserv be set up for the ABWG, but for now we'll just have to use
> our own email lists.
>
> BTW, Dave has blank petitions for signature collection. Before
> beginning, the actual text of the question has to be printed onto the
> form.
>
> Below is the proposal form that the ABWG is using to plan/approve the
> individual ballot questions.
>
> - John
>
> =========================================================
>
> Ballot Question Proposal
> Advisory Ballot Working Group
>
> Please complete this form as completely as possible and return to the
> ABWG, c/o John Andrews, jandrews166 at gmail.com
> <mailto:jandrews166 at gmail.com>.
> Use "TBD" for "to be determined".
>
> Date:
>
> Title of Question:
>
> Topic of Question:
>
> Name and contact info for question coordinator:
>
> Name of person who will serve as treasurer for ballot committee:
>
> Name of person who will serve as chair of ballot committee:
>
> Name of person on AB WG who will serve as liaison:
>
> Current draft of question text:
>
> Word count of question text:
>
> Status of vetting with Attorney General [Who is responsible?]:
>
> Explain why this proposed question is good for organizing, outreach,
> activation of citizens, and producing needed public policy changes:
>
> District targeting strategy [In which districts would there be
> sufficient public support and sufficient volunteers for the question
> to succeed? If specific districts are being targeted, identify them.]:
>
>
> Participating Organizations and Status [List organization name and
> indicate status as follows:
> A - Have given official approval to participating
> B - Have given unofficial approval to participating
> C - Have indicated support, but no firm commitment yet
> D - Have indicated interest
> E - Likely to support, but no contact has been made.
> F - May support. Worth contacting.]
>
>
> Names of persons who have volunteered to collect signatures or
> organize signature effort:
>
> NAME DISTRICT (Town/Representative)
>
> Additional relevant information:
>
>
More information about the Platform
mailing list