[statecom-discuss] from Mel

John Walsh jvwalshmd at gmail.com
Tue Jul 18 15:01:37 EDT 2006


I agree with Mel 1000%.  How many valid signatures do we have and how
many total?
I think that we need a daily report on this or at least one every other day.

If people do not know how much they need to do, many will give up
thinking it an impossible task.

If between now and the deadline we can get 100 people to gather 100
signatures (10 hours work), we shall have succeeded.  We need much
more direction on this.
HELP.
jw

On 7/18/06, Merelice <merelice at gmail.com> wrote:
> With Mel's permission, I hereby forward his message and I hereby take
> his advice and cease to write further about fusion.
> Merelice
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: mel king <mhking at mit.edu>
> Date: Jul 18, 2006 2:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [statecom-discuss] Chuck on fusion, et al
> To: Merelice <merelice at gmail.com>
> Cc: "gracegrnrnbw at aol.com" <gracegrnrnbw at aol.com>
>
> do we have the signatures to get on the ballot so that we can be a
> part of the issue debates at the different state wide forums where we
> have a chance to get our ideas for the state in the public arena?
>
> our money and energy needs to focus on getting on the ballot and not
> who other folks want on their ballots
>
> enough of this distraction
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>


More information about the statecom-discuss mailing list