[statecom-discuss] Working with other political parties - open thread

Mike Heichman mikeheichman at verizon.net
Thu Nov 9 19:21:21 EST 2006


Hi John,

What do you mean by "empire"?

The reason why I ask this is because the Libertarians believe in limited 
government. However, there idea of liberty means that they are OK with a 
"SYSTEM" that may mean allowing a few to be billionaires while billions 
of people live in misery.

I do not believe that there vision is consistent with our values.

For me, opposition to empire means to be opposed to the multiple systems 
of domination and oppression.

At the same time, I do agree that there is a wide area of common ground 
for us to work collaboratively.

Mike Heichman





John Walsh wrote:

> I think that our main job is to tell the whole truth with lots of
> documentation.
> The GRP makes no sense if the Dems are doing a fine job.
> For example, on the question of single-payer, the Dems have sold out
> their base and the entire electorate again and again.  Many have
> pretended to be allies but when push comes to shove, they have sided
> with the insurers - for example, Travaglini.  Rember Travaligni was
> the Senate author of the single-payer bill.  But once he got into
> leadership (partly thru the kind words of the single-payer folks), he
> turned against the bill that bore his name.
> Our job right now is to build party and movement, and that is why I
> emphasized party in that op-ed (NOT a letter to the editor) which by
> the way was carried in a paper in the TandG with a circulation of
> 100,000.
>
> And many of the "progressive" Dems, like Marzilli and Bonifaz, are
> far, far, far more loyal to party than principle.
>
> Two people mentioned to me that they thought that the GRP had gone
> easy on the Dems in this last round, and I think we lost one of those
> votes for that reason.  But of course that is all in one's perception.
>
> Actually I would prefer coalitions with Libertarians, were there any,
> since at the very least they oppose war and empire.
> jw
>
> On 11/9/06, Colby E. Peterson <saphron at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Topic of discussion:
>>
>> Let's say we win a seat in the state legislature at some point, which
>> is bound to happen.
>>
>> What are everyone's expectations for working with members of other
>> political parties? Be as general or specific as you'd like. I bring
>> this up because however unsavory we may find other political parties,
>> we will have to work with individual legislators in order to govern.
>> This may also mean compromise, which is getting some things and
>> sacrificing other things on all sides.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> - Colby
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> statecom-discuss mailing list
>> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>



More information about the statecom-discuss mailing list