[statecom-discuss] Working with other political parties - open
thread
Colby E. Peterson
saphron at verizon.net
Fri Nov 10 07:53:54 EST 2006
I have enjoyed this discussion about Greens and Libertarians, but I
think when I posed the question, I was talking more about our role in
a legislative body. There is that "caucusing" concept, aka,
coalitions in parliaments, where different parties form a bloc. What
are people's thoughts on how we (Greens in general) would conduct
ourselves in a legislative situation?
- Colby
On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:14 AM, John Walsh wrote:
> First, I believe that you should read Antiwar.com - and The American
> Conservative. I think you will agree at least as often as you
> disagree with the latter.
> Second, one of the main planks of the Libertarian platform is to END
> CORPORATE WELFARE.
> Third, let us draw up the list: No war, no empire, troops home, close
> foreign bases, downsize the military industries, no police state laws,
> no domestic spy agencies, no corporate welfare. We both agree on
> those but the Dems (and Republicans) do not.
> Finally, I am confident that if we settle those issues, then we can
> argue about things like single-payer health care (which by the way is
> a non-statist solution, the more statist solution being a national
> health service like the NHS in UK or the VA here). I am confident
> that on these issues Greens will win. But that does not mean we give
> up a valuable ally in the struggle of the moment. Valuable in that
> they work from an ideology which appeals at this point to many
> Americans.
> jw
> p.s. The first woman to serve in Congresss was a Republican,
> essentially a Libertarian though. She voted against entry of the US
> into WWI. Both genuine Right and genuine Left were antiwar in those
> days.
>
> On 11/9/06, Mike Heichman <mikeheichman at verizon.net> wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> At this stage in history, what would happen if "government would
>> wither
>> away"?
>>
>> The real rulers of the planet are the very wealthy few, especially
>> those
>> who rule our nation.
>>
>> My understanding (admittedly superficial) is that the libertarians
>> are
>> for limited government in the political sense of the word. I am
>> unaware
>> of anyway that they support controls over the corporations and the
>> wealthy elite.
>>
>> My guess is that we both support public education. What would
>> happen to
>> our children if the libertarians got their way and the government
>> would
>> no longer have this function? Where is the common ground?
>>
>> I believe that most people in the GRP oppose the multiple systems of
>> white, male, rich supremacy as well as the war on our ecosystem.
>> Isn't
>> this also the empire that we oppose? Where is the common ground with
>> the Libertarians?
>>
>> Yes, there is common ground in important areas where we can better
>> work
>> together. However, there are fundamental differences that I do not
>> believe are secondary to the vision of our party.
>>
>> Mike Heichman
>>
>>
>>
>> John Walsh wrote:
>>
>> > Empire? You know it when you see it.
>> > At least the Libertarians, the genuine ones, are against war and
>> > empire. Imagine if we could get that far and then duke it out over
>> > the rest. Humanity would thank us profusely.
>> > And I like talking to the Libertarians because they constantly
>> > challenge me to defend my views - instead of pretending they agree
>> > with me like the PDA. As a result I feel that my views are
>> correct -
>> > but I am always looking for flaws. And the Libertarians are
>> also in
>> > favor of a state free of religious influence and for a state
>> that does
>> > not interfere in sexual preference or speech in any way, shape or
>> > form. Are not those much more important than the level of
>> taxation or
>> > the size of government? And anyway I believe in the inherent
>> evil of
>> > the state and hope for its withering away in its present form. The
>> > Dems do not like that idea at all.
>> > jw
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/9/06, Mike Heichman <mikeheichman at verizon.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi John,
>> >>
>> >> What do you mean by "empire"?
>> >>
>> >> The reason why I ask this is because the Libertarians believe
>> in limited
>> >> government. However, there idea of liberty means that they are
>> OK with a
>> >> "SYSTEM" that may mean allowing a few to be billionaires while
>> billions
>> >> of people live in misery.
>> >>
>> >> I do not believe that there vision is consistent with our values.
>> >>
>> >> For me, opposition to empire means to be opposed to the
>> multiple systems
>> >> of domination and oppression.
>> >>
>> >> At the same time, I do agree that there is a wide area of
>> common ground
>> >> for us to work collaboratively.
>> >>
>> >> Mike Heichman
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> John Walsh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I think that our main job is to tell the whole truth with
>> lots of
>> >> > documentation.
>> >> > The GRP makes no sense if the Dems are doing a fine job.
>> >> > For example, on the question of single-payer, the Dems have
>> sold out
>> >> > their base and the entire electorate again and again. Many have
>> >> > pretended to be allies but when push comes to shove, they
>> have sided
>> >> > with the insurers - for example, Travaglini. Rember
>> Travaligni was
>> >> > the Senate author of the single-payer bill. But once he got
>> into
>> >> > leadership (partly thru the kind words of the single-payer
>> folks), he
>> >> > turned against the bill that bore his name.
>> >> > Our job right now is to build party and movement, and that is
>> why I
>> >> > emphasized party in that op-ed (NOT a letter to the editor)
>> which by
>> >> > the way was carried in a paper in the TandG with a
>> circulation of
>> >> > 100,000.
>> >> >
>> >> > And many of the "progressive" Dems, like Marzilli and
>> Bonifaz, are
>> >> > far, far, far more loyal to party than principle.
>> >> >
>> >> > Two people mentioned to me that they thought that the GRP had
>> gone
>> >> > easy on the Dems in this last round, and I think we lost one
>> of those
>> >> > votes for that reason. But of course that is all in one's
>> perception.
>> >> >
>> >> > Actually I would prefer coalitions with Libertarians, were
>> there any,
>> >> > since at the very least they oppose war and empire.
>> >> > jw
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11/9/06, Colby E. Peterson <saphron at verizon.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Topic of discussion:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Let's say we win a seat in the state legislature at some
>> point, which
>> >> >> is bound to happen.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What are everyone's expectations for working with members of
>> other
>> >> >> political parties? Be as general or specific as you'd like.
>> I bring
>> >> >> this up because however unsavory we may find other political
>> parties,
>> >> >> we will have to work with individual legislators in order to
>> govern.
>> >> >> This may also mean compromise, which is getting some things and
>> >> >> sacrificing other things on all sides.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thoughts?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Colby
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> statecom-discuss mailing list
>> >> >> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> >> >> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>> >> >>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > statecom-discuss mailing list
>> >> > statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> >> > http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> statecom-discuss mailing list
>> >> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> >> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > statecom-discuss mailing list
>> > statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> > http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> statecom-discuss mailing list
>> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
More information about the statecom-discuss
mailing list