[statecom-discuss] Who is on the SPWG committee ?

[Ron Francis]

It is absurd to think that people on a strategy committee would not be interested in the thoughts of people who cannot attend particular meetings and so it is perfectly reasonable to send things to them by whatever method which I will do regardless of what Melissa feels.

If folks were not interested in comments from members then they should not have joined the committee - that is the minimum requirement for being on a party committee (accepting communication from people in the party who have ideas related to the committee)

Can you imagine the platform committee not accepting material related to a particular issue from people.  That's just ridiculous and anti-democratic

If any member does not want the mailing then they can contact me, otherwise I will mail it out to all.

Ron Francis




Melissa Harrell <lissagrp at gmail.com> wrote: I certainly hope my name has been removed from that list since I have no
interest in recieving Ron's lengthy comments in my email box and sending it
to my home is most CERTAINLY NOT OK.  That's wouldn't be ok even if I was on
the committee.

May I suggest that Ron contact people BEFORE sending things to their home?
While Ron may not feel like waiting for Eli to get the info to them, the
committee members may have other things to do in their lives and may want to
wait.  Just like Ron has things to do with his life that he is not always
able to fully participate because he is balancing many things in his life.
Giving others the same curtesy is the least he can do.

On 5/8/07, Eli Beckerman  wrote:
>
> Ron, so far the SPWG has had 2 meetings. And we had the open strategy
> meeting this past Sunday, which was the first time we heard comments from
> GRP not on the committee. The SPWG has not yet gotten to that level of
> discussion, though now that we have heard from people we will take it up
> (including the written comments).  In addition to comments already
> received, I expect we will also solicit comments in a more detailed
> framework that we will provide (which has not yet been developed). So far
> the only framework we have provided is the 10 "focus" questions that were
> sent out.
>
> The current members of the SPWG are up on the webpage:
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/Committees/Strategic_Planning
>
>
>
> On 5/8/07, Ron Francis  wrote:
> >
> > Eli informs me that no written documents have entered into the SPWG
> > process.  That is not acceptable.
> >
> > If I can be given the names of the people on the committee, then I am
> > willing to do my own physical US mail-style mailing to get my position
> > papers on fundamental problems facing the GRP into the hands of all
> members
> > of the committee.
> >
> > So who is on the committee ?
> >
> > Ron Francis
> > _______________________________________________
> > statecom-discuss mailing list
> > statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> > http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
statecom-discuss mailing list
statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss