[statecom-discuss] Who is on the SPWG committee ?

[Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com]

I understand that Eli said he was gathering documents and would distribute 
them - please be respectful and honor the process the SPWG members outline - 
they are doing a great deal of important work - there is no need to ridicule 
boundaries.

Eli, please clarify the process for everyone again who wishes to submit 
written testimony so that everyone will follow it - Love, grace
In a message dated 5/8/07 8:54:08 PM, ronwf777 at yahoo.com writes:


> It is absurd to think that people on a strategy committee would not be 
> interested in the thoughts of people who cannot attend particular meetings and so 
> it is perfectly reasonable to send things to them by whatever method which I 
> will do regardless of what Melissa feels.
> 
> If folks were not interested in comments from members then they should not 
> have joined the committee - that is the minimum requirement for being on a 
> party committee (accepting communication from people in the party who have ideas 
> related to the committee)
> 
> Can you imagine the platform committee not accepting material related to a 
> particular issue from people.  That's just ridiculous and anti-democratic
> 
> If any member does not want the mailing then they can contact me, otherwise 
> I will mail it out to all.
> 
> Ron Francis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Melissa Harrell <lissagrp at gmail.com> wrote: I certainly hope my name has 
> been removed from that list since I have no
> interest in recieving Ron's lengthy comments in my email box and sending it
> to my home is most CERTAINLY NOT OK.  That's wouldn't be ok even if I was on
> the committee.
> 
> May I suggest that Ron contact people BEFORE sending things to their home?
> While Ron may not feel like waiting for Eli to get the info to them, the
> committee members may have other things to do in their lives and may want to
> wait.  Just like Ron has things to do with his life that he is not always
> able to fully participate because he is balancing many things in his life.
> Giving others the same curtesy is the least he can do.
> 
> On 5/8/07, Eli Beckerman  wrote:
> >
> > Ron, so far the SPWG has had 2 meetings. And we had the open strategy
> > meeting this past Sunday, which was the first time we heard comments from
> > GRP not on the committee. The SPWG has not yet gotten to that level of
> > discussion, though now that we have heard from people we will take it up
> > (including the written comments).  In addition to comments already
> > received, I expect we will also solicit comments in a more detailed
> > framework that we will provide (which has not yet been developed). So far
> > the only framework we have provided is the 10 "focus" questions that were
> > sent out.
> >
> > The current members of the SPWG are up on the webpage:
> > http://www.green-rainbow.org/Committees/Strategic_Planning

> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/8/07, Ron Francis  wrote:
> > >
> > > Eli informs me that no written documents have entered into the SPWG
> > > process.  That is not acceptable.
> > >
> > > If I can be given the names of the people on the committee, then I am
> > > willing to do my own physical US mail-style mailing to get my position
> > > papers on fundamental problems facing the GRP into the hands of all
> > members
> > > of the committee.
> > >
> > > So who is on the committee ?
> > >
> > > Ron Francis
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > statecom-discuss mailing list
> > > statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> > > http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > statecom-discuss mailing list
> > statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> > http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> statecom-discuss mailing list
> statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom-discuss
> 
> 




**************************************
 See what's free at http://www.aol.com.