[statecom-discuss] Re: Re: [Needtoknow] Self-declared Demogreens!

Yarden yen.yarden at verizon.net
Mon Oct 29 17:42:49 EST 2007


To all participants,
(and to John Walsh -- No, John, it is not all right and it is not 
innocent.  If you will not desist, perhaps other will be able.)

If every time someone chooses to throw a feint, people are so turned on 
by the obvious wrongs that they are distracted from the tasks at hand, 
and less able to pursue any course of action.  If instead of sounding 
the alarums, the guardians of our cause would search out the 
malefactors they suspect, and quash their activities, sparing the rest 
of us from fighting rearguard actions defending a non-existent retreat, 
we might might make our energies available to the vanguard of our party.

To people who have to pass through the morasses of recriminatory 
behaviors, inside the NC of the GPUS, and stupidly outright malfeasance 
outside the party, it becomes tiresome.  Big noise about opponents in 
the playground, should never be allowed to still the voices of 
reasonable response that make for effective struggle against 
oppression.  Again the pathetic response draws off energies that could 
be used for making something new, into a waste of angry recrimination 
against dead weight of a very traditional sucker punch.  Where did we 
all grow up to be so ignorant.
Peace,
Elie




On Monday, October 29, 2007, at 12:59  PM, 
statecom-discuss-request at green-rainbow.org wrote:

> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:39:10 -0400
> From: "Jamie O'Keefe" <jokeefe at jamesokeefe.org>
> Subject: Re: [statecom-discuss] Re: [Needtoknow] Self-declared
> 	Demogreens!
> To: "Discussion List for StateCom members"
> 	<statecom-discuss at green-rainbow.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<ca1892b20710290639h186dd48cx35653dd4929906d6 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Thanks Merelice and Bill for the questions you raise.
>
> On 10/28/07, Merelice <merelice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1 - Is there a possibility that the MIT Greens is currently only a
>> paper organization?
>
> It is possible.  I have emailed the last person I knew as a contact at
> the MIT Greens to see how they are doing and to help inter-local
> communication.
>
>> 2 - When was the last time the GRP was in touch with college campuses
>> to see whether a current Campus Green Chapter even exists?
>
> Actually, i would ask that question about all locals.  I will start 
> the calls.
>
>> 3 - How would a campus chapter know how to be in touch with us or with
>> a local chapter?
>
> Good question.
>
>> On 10/28/07, BillCunningham <etwee at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Neither of the individuals mentioned has ever, to my knowledge, 
>>> contacted MRGRA or offered to help us in any way.
>
> Well one is in Hadley so I don't think they would contact the MRGRA.
> ;-)  In regards to Greg Dennis, I'll see what I can find out.
>
>>> Goddammit, this is NOT O.K.
>
> Certainly, if folks have been Green-Rainbows, but are now no longer
> members and are acting as if they are, then that raises a number of
> issues.  I think dialogue would be most appropriate as the method to
> find a solution.
>
> Jamie
>
>



More information about the statecom-discuss mailing list