[statecom-discuss] agreements

[Nat Fortune]

> On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com wrote:
>
> One sets of agreements for everyone that we can rely on when our  
> backs are
> against the wall in the dark allies of life.   If we want to  
> renegotiate those
> agreements, great - situations change.   But our commitment to each  
> other need
> to remain the same - which to me means not trying to guess at  
> intents when we
> could instead follow (or renegotiate) real agreements.
>
> I did not care *who* was on our ballot line - I cared that whoever  
> they were,
> that they had as much commitment to building our party as we did.    
> Period.
>
> That is why agreements matter, because many of us, our lives depend  
> upon
> them.   - Grace

what agreement did we violate? We followed the wording that you  
yourself provided, in writing. The innuendo that we did otherwise is  
disrespectful and dishonorable.