[statecom] RE: completed CDLC report for St Comm
John Andrews
jandrews at ll.mit.edu
Thu Apr 12 14:56:57 EDT 2007
Bill,
The question of the balance between electoral work and other efforts
(issue work, movement-building, etc) is a key question before the
Strategic Plan Working Group. Soon we expect to send out a set of
discussion questions that can either be responded to at a general
meeting (which will be held in early May) or by written submissions. I
hope you will give us your comments then, because you've obviously
been thinking carefully about this subject.
- John Andrews
(Member of SPWG)
BillCunningham wrote:
> Really, the same thing may be said of almost everything we do: there is very little participation. This is in no way to belittle the efforts of folks working on CDLC. But aren't the immediate reasons for this too obvious to explain?
>
> Taken together, easily 85 percent of the energy and money spent by GRP and its activists has been on elections. Has anyone ever costed it out? By now there should be a burden of proof on those who believe that that the electoral process is a very important way for us to build our party and to connect with the various progressive and social movements that are attempting to create a better world.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>> From: "mikeheichman at verizon.net" <mikeheichman at verizon.net>
>> Sent: Apr 12, 2007 1:20 PM
>> To: statecom at green-rainbow.org
>> Subject: [statecom] RE: completed CDLC report for St Comm
>>
>>
>> CDLC REPORT TO THE
>> APRIL 14th STATE COMMITTEE MEETING
>> & TO THE CDLC
>> NOVEMBER 7, 2006-APRIL 12, 2007
>>
>> Mike Heichman
>> Interim Coordinator of CDLC
>> mikeheichman at verizon.net 617-265-8143
>> April 12, 2007
>>
>>
>> Dear State Committee and CDLC,
>>
>> I have been acting as the Interim Coordinator of the CDLC for the past
>> several months.
>>
>> I want to thank everyone who has participated in any way with the work of
>> this Committee. We are all volunteers and
>> all of your work is appreciated. I believe that there is a strong agreement
>> in the party that the electoral process is a
>> very important way for us to build our party and to connect with the
>> various progressive and social movements that
>> are attempting to create a better world.
>>
>> At the same time, I am disheartened by the lack of participation both by
>> CDLC and the State Committee. Only a small
>> handful participates in meetings and only a slightly larger number
>> participate in doing the work between meetings
>> and/or contributing ideas and offering feedback through our e-mail list.
>>
>> Below is my report to the State Committee and to CDLC. I ask for your
>> feedback. Additionally, it is my hope that
>> more of you will increase your participation in the work of this committee.
>>
>> Mike Heichman
>> mikeheichman at verizon.net
>> 617-265-8143
>>
>>
>> I. CDLC Report to the 11-1106 State Comm. Meeting by Mike Heichman
>>
>> Shortly before the November 7, 2006 election, the CDLC was re-established.
>> A small number of us had 2 phone
>> conferences on September 12 and October 17. The immediate goal was to
>> strengthen this Committee in order to
>> better prepare for electoral campaigns in the future.
>>
>> In order to do this, we decided to focus on the following areas:
>>
>> A. Evaluation of the Team 2006 campaign
>>
>> We would send out a questionnaire to Team 2006. Additionally, we wanted to
>> send the questionnaire out to other
>> GRP candidates from the 2002 elections to the present. The goal was to
>> create and distribute a report by the end of
>> January. John Andrews agreed to coordinate this project.
>>
>> B. Municipal Elections, 2007
>>
>> We realized that we were not in a position to do much to recruit municipal
>> candidates for the spring of 2007. We
>> were hopeful that we would be in a much stronger position to recruit, train
>> and support local candidates whose
>> election would be in the fall of 2007.
>>
>> C. CDLC will provide a Training and Resource Guide.
>>
>> Melissa agreed to come up with a draft list of what needs to be included in
>> this document by 12-1.
>>
>> D. Request to the Platform Committee
>>
>> We recommend that the Platform Committee develop generic platforms and
>> issue papers, which would be an
>> important way for the party to contribute to our candidates.
>>
>> E. We decided to develop a campaign plan for the 2008 Elections.
>>
>>
>> II. Brief Meeting during the November 11th State Comm. Meeting
>>
>> Pat Keaney, John Andrews (recorder), Jamie McLaughlin, Ron Francis, Gary
>> Hicks, Ralph Walton, Jill Stein and Mike
>> Heichman
>>
>> We decided to have our next meeting on Tuesday, December 12, 7:30 PM at
>> Bertucci's Restaurant in Cambridge.
>>
>> John would send out the Candidate’s Questionnaire for CDLC comment by
>> 11/12. Comments should be returned by
>> 11/17 so questionnaire could go to the candidates by 11/20.
>>
>> We wanted to capture and archive all press releases and position papers
>>
> >from 2006 candidates. Mike will ask
>
>> campaign webmasters if they would “dump” the entire contents of their
>> websites in files for us.
>>
>> Ron noted that it was rather late to start running for municipal office
>> this spring. But we should support GRP
>> candidates who are ready. A run in fall elections is more feasible. The
>> most viable candidates are those who are
>> already known in their community. The more help we can offer, the better.
>> We should consider a “municipal
>> platform” for candidates who will run for municipal offices. We need to
>> help recruit volunteers to assist candidates.
>>
>> III. Proposal by Elie Yarden to vet his proposal: Green Party National
>> Candidacies for President of the U. S. in 2008
>> Elections.
>>
>> Draft Proposal:
>> 1. We, the Green-Rainbow Party of Massachusetts declare, with regard to
>> the upcoming Presidential election, 2008,
>> that we will place in nomination candidates on the Massachusetts
>> Green-Rainbow primary ballot.
>> 2. We will consider as candidates only those who wish to have their names
>> placed on the ballot, and will select
>> delegates to the Green Party Nominating Convention by the same, or
>> improved, apportionment methods that were
>> used in the election of 2004.
>> 3. We will not, as a party, support independent candidates or candidates
>> of other parties.
>>
>> IV. Highlights of the 12-12 Meeting, Bertucci’s Rest.
>>
>> Present: John Andrews, Dave England, Ron Francis, Melissa Harrell, Mike
>> Heichman, Gary Hicks, Pat Keaney, Jaimie
>> McLaughlin, Grace Ross, Ralph Walton, Paul Yin
>> Mike H facilitated the meeting: John took the minutes.
>>
>> OPENING QUESTION
>>
>> The Committee discussed the opening question: “What is the role of the CDLC
>> and what should be our priorities?”
>> The consensus could be written as follows:
>>
>> The CDLC’s role is to recruit and develop candidates, to provide tools to
>> assist candidates in their campaigns, to
>> assess the results achieved in campaigns, and to plan for future electoral
>> success. In fulfilling these roles, the CDLC
>> may work with locals, recruit candidates, write guidebooks, conduct
>> training, and facilitate access to GRP resources,
>> provide legal guidance, and target resources to priority campaigns.
>>
>> CANDIDATE DEVELOPMENT
>>
>> Ron noted that he has suggested phoning GRP voters to ask if they are
>> interested in running for public office as was
>> done in Maine. Positive responses would be evaluated and candidates helped
>> to realistically assess their readiness.
>> He will resend his written proposal to the CDLC for discussion at a future
>> meeting.
>>
>> It was decided that it is too late to provide significant assistance to
>> candidates for municipal races this spring. But
>> some GRP members may be preparing to run without our knowledge. An email
>> appeal will be published asking that
>> such candidates contact us. We may be able to provide them with limited
>> assistance (e.g. campaign how-to
>> literature,
>> lists of GRP members in their districts, etc.) Ron felt that it was
>> important to give candidates a realistic
>> understanding of what would be required to run a campaign and what level of
>> success they could expect. Grace
>> noted that there were other dimensions to “success” other than electability
>> that should be considered, such as
>> whether the campaign
>> strengthened local GRP organizations or whether it added to the diversity
>> of the Party. She also cautioned that self-
>> assessments could be biased to the negative in the case of diversity
>> candidates, and we should work with them to
>> guard against this.
>>
>> John circulated notes from the 12/10/06 campaign debriefing meeting at
>> which a breakout group had discussed
>> ways in which the GRP could support candidates. Suggestions in the list
>> included a "matching fund" to augment
>> candidate fundraising, help with polling, and help with phonebanking.
>>
>>
>> CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT AND CAMPAIGN WRAP-UP
>>
>> Mike contacted candidates and asked that they assist the Party in various
>> ways as they wrap up their campaigns. He
>> has asked for them to complete the CDLC Candidate Questionnaire, provide
>> copies of their campaign literature and
>> press releases, and provide any additional information they think we should
>> have.
>>
>> John reported that so far only three returns have come in for the CDLC
>> Candidate Questionnaire. He expects that a
>> few more may be returned with a second request. A final compilation of
>> responses will be available by the end of
>> January.
>>
>> John suggested that candidates be asked to share their volunteer and donor
>> lists with the GRP. Although some
>> privacy concerns might legitimately limit the sharing, it is very useful to
>> the Party to expand its list of GRP volunteers
>> and donors.
>>
>> CANDIDATE’S GUIDE
>>
>> Melissa provided a list of topics that might be included in a potential
>> CDLC Candidate’s Guide. Included were things
>> such as media lists, how-to samples, issue information, materials vendors,
>> data management suggestions, GRP party
>> operatives list, and fundraising guide. It was noted that a substantial
>> amount of such material could be assembled
>>
> >from previous campaigns or from material published by Green organizations
>
>> in other states. People were asked to
>> send Melissa any material that might be useful to the effort. It was
>> suggested that the product should be a digital
>> collection rather than a single published manual. The collection might
>> include a campaign calendar that included
>> deadlines and suggested ready dates. Pat will provide material on the topic
>> of Voter ID and voter databases. John will
>> provide guidance material used in the 2002 gubernatorial campaign.
>>
>> WRAP-UP
>>
>> Jaimie will consult with Elie Yarden and provide a report on National Party
>> plans at the next CDLC meeting. These
>> plans will be considered in developing our strategy for the 2008
>> Presidential and Senate races.
>>
>> Our intention is to have one physical meeting each month, with phone
>> conferences should additional discussions
>> prove necessary. The next meeting will be on January 16 at a location to be
>> determined.
>>
>> Mike noted that the CDLC should be looking for a new committee director to
>> relieve him of his current
>> responsibilities.
>>
>> V. Draft of First Campaign Manual
>>
>> In early January, Mike finished the draft of the first campaign manual.
>>
>> In January, 2002 Karen Kubby had created a "Local Elections Campaign
>> Manual" for the Independent Progressive
>> Politics Network. You can find the whole document at their website:
>> www.ippn.org/article.php?ID=pamphlets.html
>>
>> He edited the document to make it shorter. If you want a copy, let him know.
>>
>> VI. Highlights of the January 16th Meeting, 7:00 pm, Lexington
>>
>> Present: John Andrews, Mike Heichman, Ellie Yarden. Minutes taken by John.
>>
>> VETTING OF PROPOSAL: GREEN PARTY NATIONAL CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT
>>
>> Proposal from Elie Yarden regarding GRP national candidates was inspected.
>> CDLC had no problem with proposal. It
>> was suggested that the proposal be subject to review later in the year as
>> the nature of the Presidential options
>> becomes clearer. The proposal should also be subject to review at the GRP
>> convention to provide an opportunity for
>> involvement by wider range of Party members. The CDLC would like it to be
>> noted that the level of GRP resource
>> commitment to the Presidential race in Massachusetts should be determined
>> in the context of overall GRP electoral
>> strategy and GRP party-building strategy.
>>
>> VETTING OF PROPOSAL: LOCAL BALLOT 2008 EXPLORATION
>>
>> The proposal from Ron for a local ballot 2008 exploration committee was
>> discussed. The CDLC felt that such
>> referenda could be useful tools for growing the Party at the local level.
>> Because resources available to the Party for
>> such activities is limited the most likelihood for a successful referendum
>> would be to have it sponsored by a GRP
>> local chapter. The CDLC notes that some locals may choose to focus on other
>> outreach vehicles (such as getting
>> behind a candidate for local office.) The CDLC felt that rather than have
>> a single topic determined by committee it
>> might better to let the locals select a topic that is best suited to their
>> community and their volunteer interests.
>> Noting that another proposal concerned development of a strategic plan, the
>> CDLC felt it would be best to have
>> topics that were included in the strategic plan (assuming that the State
>> Committee passes the strategic planning
>> proposal.). Hence, we recommend that this effort follow the adoption of a
>> strategic plan.
>>
>> VETTING OF PROPOSAL: TELEPHONE OUTREACH TO RECRUIT CANDIDATES
>>
>> The CDLC discussed the proposal from Ron to initiate a telephone poll of
>> GRP members to ask if they would consider
>> running for public office. The CDLC suggests that such calling should be
>> part of a broader plan for member
>> activation. A telephone contact should probably first ask people to attend
>> a local meeting, sign up for mailings,
>> make a donation, or undertake other commitments. There is concern that
>> persons would offer to run for office who
>> do not understand the commitment or who are unsuitable as candidates, and
>> the CDLC would be hard-pressed
>> educating such potential candidates and trying to determine if they are
>> qualified. If volunteers were from areas
>> without active volunteers, they would face a difficult challenge in
>> running. The CDLC feels that a more
>> practical approach would be to use telephone calling to build up
>> participation in GRP locals, and then ask the locals
>> to poll their active members and recommend anyone interested in running for
>> office. Candidates identified in this
>> way would have an implicit local endorsement and a starting base of
>> volunteer support.
>>
>> Elie noted that telephone lists for calling should be based upon recently
>> active voters to ensure that telephone
>> numbers are valid. GRP candidates have sometimes purchased such lists as
>> part of a database for get-out-the-vote
>> efforts. John will investigate the availability and cost of such lists.
>>
>> VETTING OF PROPOSAL: STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE
>>
>> The CDLC discussed the proposal from Eli Beckerman to initiate a strategic
>> planning process that would produce a
>> GRP Strategic Plan for 2007-8. John indicated that he had participated in
>> the writing of this proposal. After
>> discussion, the CDLC concluded that such a Plan would probably be helpful
>> in recruiting and training candidates,
>> and that it would contribute to GRP electoral success. The CDLC makes the
>> following recommendations: 1) Use
>> email to widely solicit invitations to GRP members to participate in the
>> strategic planning process. 2) Issue a special
>> appeal to volunteers who would add diversity to the planning committee. 3)
>> Consider adding representatives from
>> active GRP local chapters.
>>
>> Elie noted that simply picking issues was not the whole story, and that
>> sometimes an emphasis on issues could drive
>> members away who were not comfortable with the issue. He suggested that
>> the strategy should be careful to find a
>> way to build a sense of community and participation.
>>
>> CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE
>>
>> John Andrews reported on the 2006 Candidates Questionnaire (CQ). Only
>> three completed questionnaires were
>> returned. The data has been compiled. It is hoped that two or three
>> additional questionnaires will be returned
>> before the final report is completed. The returns are helpful in
>> establishing the priorities of the CDLC. From the
>> returns so far, it appears that candidates would especially value Party
>> support in things such as volunteer
>> recruitment, phonebanking, issue research, staff training, direct GRP
>> financial support, help with obtaining voter list,
>> blog presence, GOTV, and media outreach.
>> OTHER BUSINESS
>>
>> Elie Yarden delivered to us a questionnaire from the GPUS that asks for
>> information on things such as ballot access
>> in Massachusetts. The CDLC will read the questionnaire and attempt to
>> provide answers. Elie, together with Jamie
>> M. will serve as the link between the CDLC and the national committee of
>> GPUS, and will notify us of anything that
>> concerns CDLC responsibilities.
>>
>> VII. Highlights of the CDLC Phone Conference on 2-22-07, 9 PM
>>
>> Present by telephone: John Andrews, Mike Heichman, Jaime McLaughlin, Grace
>> Ross, John Walsh, Ellie Yarden.
>> Minutes taken by John.
>>
>> Mike has compiled a list of known GRP candidates for municipal offices in
>> 2007:
>> Chuck Turner, City Council, Boston
>> Rich Purcell, City Council, Holyoke
>> Luc Schuster, School Committee, Cambridge
>> Adam Sacks, Town Meeting, Lexington
>> Judy Gates, Library Trustee, Marblehead
>> Grace Ross, Mayor/City Council, Worcester (being explored)
>>
>> 2008 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
>>
>> State Committee passed Ellie Y. proposal. Its basic significance is that
>> the GRP intends to place the name of a GRP/
>> GPUS member on its presidential primary line in 2008. The delegates elected
>> will thus be pledged to a GRP (GPUS)
>> member and not to any third party or independent candidate. This intention
>> could be reconsidered by the state
>> convention.
>>
>> Ellie suggested that CDLC members keep an eye on the national GPUS
>> Presidential Campaign Support webpage at
>> http://www.gp.org/committees/pcsc .
>>
>> 2008 SENATE RACE
>>
>> John Kerry is expected to run for reelection in 2008. The most likely
>> Republican challenger will be Charles Baker
>> (head of Harvard-Pilgrim HMO, former head of the Pioneer Institute think
>> tank). John W. and Ellie noted that this race
>> is an opportunity for a GRP challenger to hold Senator Kerry accountable
>> for his support of the Iraq war, among
>> other things. This race could also achieve the 3 per cent statewide vote
>> needed to retain GRP major party status
>> under MA election law. It is important to find a good candidate. Mike
>> reported on a conversation he had with a
>> certain Boston City Councilor who would be an excellent candidate if he
>> should decide to run. Grace reported that
>> she had talked to another possible candidate who was qualified. John A.
>> expressed concerns that in this race it might
>> be difficult to get sufficient media coverage to get our message out. Grace
>> felt that the press was now inclined to
>> give more coverage to GRP candidates, and that past problems with
>> visibility could be behind us. John suggested
>> that we might need a preliminary campaign plan defining our objectives in
>> the race and the resources we could offer
>> a candidate. Mike suggested that at our next meeting we take up the
>> question of forming an exploratory committee.
>> He suggested that diversity be a consideration in the composition of this
>> committee.
>>
>> PLAN AND TIMETABLE
>>
>> Mike is assembling a timeline for electoral activities, including statewide
>> and legislative races and ballot questions.
>> He will send a draft to the CDLC list is about a week.
>>
>> There do not appear to any active GRP local referenda this year. However
>> Ron is working with local chapters on
>> possible referenda campaigns in 2008. Grace has been discussing possible
>> referenda addressing the issue of global
>> warming.
>>
>>
>> CDLC CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE
>>
>> John A. reported that because only two candidates (and one campaign
>> manager) had returned the CDLC candidate
>> questionnaire, the results are somewhat incomplete. No candidate from years
>> prior to 2006 returned the
>> questionnaire. Nevertheless, they provide some guidance on what candidates
>> need from CDLC. John suggested that
>> in the future, candidates be asked to agree to participate in post-campaign
>> assessments as a condition of receiving
>> GRP endorsement. In response to a request from Ellie, Grace indicated that
>> she would submit a response, although
>> not all questions may be answered.
>>
>> Mike sent a letter to candidates asking for copies of website material and
>> suggesting that they hold post-campaign
>> debriefings with their volunteers. He has not received any website material
>> so far. It seems that some informal post-
>> campaign meetings were held (by Ross and Stein campaigns), although no
>> specific results from these were passed
>> on to the CDLC.
>>
>> VOTER LISTS
>>
>> John A. is investigating ways in which the GRP could help candidates
>> acquire and use voter lists. The objective is to
>> acquire the lists with less effort and less cost, and to train campaign
>> staff in their use. Notes on this subject have
>> been posted to the CDLC email list.
>>
>> STRATEGIC PLAN WORKING GROUP
>>
>> After discussing the work of the Committee, John Andrews agreed to be our
>> rep.
>>
>> MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
>>
>> John Walsh noted that creating an email contact list of GRP members would
>> be of value in several ways. One way to
>> create the list would be to call registered GRP voters by telephone and see
>> if they would be willing to give us their
>> email address. John commented that this would be a good project for a GRP
>> local chapter, and the Membership
>> Committee should take up this idea. The question of whether email
>> lists could be purchased for this purpose will be investigated.
>>
>> VIII. On March 2 Mike presented a draft plan for the 2008 elections to the
>> CDLC and State Comm. He got responses
>>
> >from 3 members of CDLC. On March 6, after making some changes, he submitted
>
>> a proposal to the State Comm. for
>> its April 14th meeting and vetted the proposal to many committees. Shortly
>> after he received some feedback from 3
>> members of CDLC and a few days ago received some feedback from Jamie
>> O’Keefe, which is included in the proposal
>> for the April 14th meeting. As of now, no one has co-sponsored his proposal.
>>
>> IX. Highlights of the CDLC Phone Meeting, March 28, 2007, 9:00 pm
>>
>> Present: John Andrews, Mike Heichman, Jamie McLaughlin Minutes taken by John
>>
>> A brief discussion was had on the need for increasing the number of
>> volunteers participating in the CDLC.
>>
>> Mike agreed to present the CDLC report at the next State Committee meeting.
>>
>> VETTING MIKE' PROPOSAL FOR THE STATE COMM. MEET: Those present
>> were not prepared to vet the proposal.
>>
>> 2008 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
>>
>> Approaches to the 2008 Presidential race were discussed. John noted that
>> because it was not clear yet whether the
>> Party would have a viable candidate or what the strategy of the race would
>> be, it was not clear whether the race
>> would be an important one for us or would be something with little impact.
>> He felt that if the Party ran an unknown
>> candidate,
>> and few resources were available, the race would get little attention. Mike
>> noted that some volunteers come out
>> every four years to work in the Presidential race, and we should keep them
>> active.
>>
>> OPEN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RACE (MEEHAN)
>>
>> The open congressional seat vacated by Rep. Meehan was discussed. Mike
>> noted that in order to run a meaningful
>> race, it would be necessary to get an early start. It will require
>> thousands of signatures to get our candidate on the
>> ballot, and we will not be able to collect signatures from voters in other
>> parties. A major signature collection effort
>> would
>> be required. Inquiries will be made regarding possible candidates. If the
>> candidate herself/himself cannot bring
>> resources to the race, then the GRP will have to be prepared to back the
>> race with an intense effort.
>>
>> BOSTON CITY COUNCIL - CHUCK TURNER
>>
>> It was noted that Chuck Turner is running for reelection. Mike will be in
>> touch with Chuck and will identify
>> appropriate ways in which we can support his candidacy.
>>
>> WORCESTER CITY COUNCIL - GRACE ROSS
>>
>> Grace Ross is considering a run for Worcester City Council/Mayor of
>> Worcester.
>>
>> CANDIDATE’S QUESTIONNAIRE
>>
>> John reported that no further responses were received to the candidate’s
>> questionnaire. The three responses
>> received are not sufficient for any statistical picture, so the collected
>> submissions must stand on their own.
>> Nevertheless, the responses provide some documentation of the needs of
>> candidates. It was felt that in the future,
>> candidates should agree to return post-election questionnaires as part of
>> accepting the GRP endorsement.
>>
>> VOTER LISTS
>>
>> John reported that he contacted Bob LeLievre regarding the Vbase voter list
>> software. Several GRP candidates have
>> used Vbase and found it useful. Bob is willing to discuss leasing
>> arrangements that would allow the Party to provide
>> lists to all GRP candidates at a reduced cost. No specifics have yet been
>> discussed. John noted that some ideas to be
>> discussed are:
>> - Set up a network for exchanging advice among campaigns
>> - Identify a party-wide consultant/trainer.
>> - Arrange for training session by GRP volunteers
>> - Arrange for training session by vendor
>> - Central service center generates lists according to orders from the
>> candidates
>>
>>
>> X. The tech committee (specifically Jamie O’Keefe) is looking at new
>> software for managing our supporter/volunteer
>> contacts. The current tool he is evaluating is called CiviCRM
>> (www.civicrm.org) that has been recommended by other
>> GPs.
>>
>> There is an add-in in progress to add voter canvassing features. You can
>> find out more at http://civicrm.org/node/
>> 169 .
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application
>> hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
>> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> StateCom mailing list
>> StateCom at green-rainbow.org
>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom
>>
>
>
> Bill Cunningham
> _______________________________________________
> StateCom mailing list
> StateCom at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom
>
>
More information about the StateCom
mailing list