[statecom] Special State Committee Meeting now in session

[Jamie O'Keefe]

Hi Merelice, et. al.

> At the April 12 StateCom meeting where calling this meeting received
> more than the 1/3rd vote needed, I seem to recall Dan's saying that
> the purpose of the meeting had to be stated for that approval to be
> valid. Further, I believe he said that nothing could be added to the
> agenda. In other words, adding another item would require yet another
> 1/3rd agreement from StateCom members and then another 10-day notice
> to call the meeting.
>
> If that understanding is correct, then some of your description about
> submitting other proposals for this online meeting or voting on new
> members would not apply, and the only agenda item for this online
> meeting is StateCom's required approval of the delegation to the
> nominating convention. Could you clarify?

To summarize for everyone else, at the Adcom meeting on Monday, 6/16,
we decided that we would put forward a consensus ballot to approve any
people who asked to be appointed to the state committee and to clarify
this question.

I have asked Larry Ely, our diligent Secretary, for the text of the
clarifying question to be put to the state committee in case I missed
anything in the wording.

I have summarized the people who wish to be appointed to the state
committee and sent it to Dan to assist in his credentialing.

Thank you all for your patience.

Jamie