[statecom] "blocking" concerns

[Nat Fortune]

Oh for goodness sake, campers. For what it is worth, it is our  
virtual meeting facilitator who used the 'blocking concern' language  
and asked participants to explicitly specify whether their concern  
was a 'blocking concern.' Do you think you might be just a little to  
quick to jump on a participant who followed instructions?

yours for civility,

Nat Fortune

> On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:10 PM, gary hicks wrote:
>
> to prattle about blocking concerns


>> Hi,
>>
>> So it looks like there are several blocking concerns about PROPOSALS
>> #1 and #2.  This blocks us from coming to consensus on these two
>> proposals.
>>
>> Please, email your concerns by 6pm Monday, June 23rd, so we can list
>> them and attempt to resolve them.  Please also specify whether your
>> concern is a blocking concern or not.
>>
>> If you haven't yet seen the proposals, or just want to review them,
>> you can find their text at:
>>
>> http://www.green-rainbow.org/pipermail/statecom/2008-June/008483.html
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Jamie