[statecom] preliminary report on adcom meeting

[Jim Hammerman]

Hi Eli and other AdCom members,
I think in a consensus seeking organization, with a decision-making 
process that allows for a fall back to a 2/3 majority vote (except where 
3/4 is required), that failure to approve a plan actually counts as 
rejecting it. I think Merelice is right that it's the last sentence of the 
paragraph I quoted which is relevant, not the first two, as she previously 
stated. 

However, my question about the status of attempts to revise the 
allocation, as required by our plan, still stands. Were proposals for 
revision considered at the meeting? And what were the dispositions of 
those proposals?
Thanks,
Jim
------
>From Eli:
Jim, the latter part of that paragraph applies to AdCom REJECTING
the CDLC results. AdCom did not reject them, we failed to approve
or reject them.
------
>From my previous post:

> "The Administrative Committee must review and approve or reject the
> results within one (1) week
> of receiving them. Failure to approve or reject the results will
> automatically approve them. If
> they reject the results, the CDLC co-chairs, in consultation with other
> CDLC members, will
> review the results, make any changes and submit the revised results 
within
> one (1) week of the
> rejection. If the Administrative Committee still does not agree with the
> calculations that
> determine the results, then they have one (1) week to revise them or 
they
> are accepted."
>
> I think the relevant section of this plan is the _last_ sentence, which
> says that if AdCom does not agree with the allocation they need to 
revise
> them. So, were proposals for revision considered at yesterday's meeting?
> And, if so, what were they and what were the dispositions of those
> proposals?