[statecom] short defense Re: From the Co-Chairs Re: Legal Opinion

[Yarden]

To have issued the opinion that I read the lawyer must have had much  
more to go on than "all of the relevant documents."
I am still waiting to find out from someone who can read better than I  
am able what the relevance of "Massachusetts
election law, G. L. c. 53, Sections 13, 14 and 15" is to any questions  
asked of the lawyer in question.  Have any members of the A Minority  
Opinion faction read the sections cited?  To what might have the  
lawyer been referring.  If I were seeking legal advice in the course  
of seeking consensus, I certainly would invite someone of opposing  
views to the consultation.  Seeking consensus according to some  
proponents includes having access to the same information.  'Seeking  
consensus' should never be a cover for intrigues in hegemonic quarrels.
Elie Yarden
MRGRA

On May 30, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Merelice wrote:

> On 5/26/08, Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com <Gracegrnrnbw at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> The lawyer who issued this opinion had all of the relevant  
>> documents (unlike
>> merelice implies- .....
>>
>> The questions sent to the Head of the Elections Divission were  
>> *not* in fact
>> agreed to by adcom.....
>
>
> Grace has a courteous way of calling me a liar. I stand by my  
> comments.
>
> Merelice
> _______________________________________________
> StateCom mailing list
> StateCom at green-rainbow.org
> http://www.green-rainbow.org/mailman/listinfo/statecom