[WB-Discuss] Once again part 1A
PHWernick at aol.com
PHWernick at aol.com
Sat Nov 15 10:32:03 EST 2003
Continued from part1
Once Again on Organization-Where I Stand-Part1A
What is needed is a multi-pronged approach,involving democratic party
activists, progressive activists who do not vote, liberal democrats,as well as the
unenrolled and non-voting.This approach leaves open many doors to long time
political activists as well as newcomers.
This approach means that the GRP as we know it,with a small group, will be
transforned from its present status. I am agnostic at this point as to whether
the GRP should try an electoral run in Watertown.It all depends on what basis
this is done. If it is attempted with a narrow,radical, aproach focusing on
foreign policy, little may come of such work.If it is attempted,enlisting the
support of liberal democrats and appealing to a wide stratum of the Watertown
population, it may succeed.
Were the GRP and GRP in Watertown to function on the basis of having members
in solid agreement with a clearly defined program, it would be simple to offer
up the candidate with the most time as a PARTY candidate.Absent this type of
agreement,it may more or less be an individual decision to run, with the party
tagging along. I am not in favor of such an approach but if an articulate
candidate can be found, and a minimum program agreed upon, an electoral campaign
can be the opportunity to reach out to others and transform the party from
what it is now.Many people crave the opportunity to be involved in a significant
political party that can help humanely transform their own community as well
as having a window to the larger world.The success of the GRP will depend on
its ability to attract individuals from across the democratic spectrum and not
strictly along ideological lines.
Local runs at office need to enlist political operatives such as Tony with
prior experience, though this does not negate input from all in a learning
experience.In addition, any candidate needs to focus on town and state issues such
as housing, municipal services,taxes, and education. Over the summer Alex
invited us to a town forum on housing and I was struck by the large attendance
of a mostly middle class electorate with seemingly ordinary middle class
concerns and bread and butter issues that affect their pocketbooks.This was no
granola crunching crowd.I came with shorts and sandals and a T shirt, but despite
the stifling summer heat,most of my neighbors were dressed to the nines.A
small cultural commentary, but one that presages huge cultural and political gaps
between the GRP and ordinary working people.At one time Tony Lorenzen out in
Worcester used to talk about this issue.
The bottom line is that if the GRP seeks to run for office based on notions
of Imperialism, the war in Iraq, or troubles in the middle east such as the
ongoing war between Israel/Palestine, it will probably fail. This does not mean
that Watertown citizens are not intelligent and are not capable of
understanding worldly issues.It does not negate the introduction of such issues in a
campaign perhaps in a small way as part of a larger program.
A cautionary note about replicating the experience of Cambridge and
Somerville is in order. The demographics in Watertown are vastly different from
Cambridge and Somerville, with their large student and post student population.And
although Watertown boasts a large Armenian and middle eastern population, I do
not believe that focusing on issues particular to one ethnic group or one
segment of the population can be a winning strategy over the long haul.Rightly or
wrongly, citizens tend to compartmentalize and leave foreign policy to
congressional and presidential races.
Now,the view I have just put out here may seem heretical to some who have
invested time and energy in sectoral approaches. Let me repeat- what I have
stated in no way is meant to detract from the outstanding,magnificent, and
thoughtful, organizing talents of Wendy and Aram.It does mean that in terms of
electoral office, I am advocating an approach that runs across ethnic lines and that
focuses on class interests. Alex pointed out that while the December 4 event
mentions diversity, it does not include Irish Americans, Armenian Americans,
Greek Americans , Italian Americans, nor I would add Jewish Americans .
However, It seems perfectly respectable to hold such an event stressing the
diversity of groups that have volunteered to be part of the event and that are part
of Watertown's mix. And I am sure the middle eastern flavor will be both
informative and educational.
On the other hand, I would not support an electoral candidate or campaign
that appealed to ethnic allegiance.As a Jewish American,I might have tried to
involve for example the B'nai Or congregation that meets in Watertown, and that
has financially supported a Palestinian businessman in Watertown. But I felt
it was best to let the organizers go with their own energy and I had no
intention of trying to alienate others who,after all, are hopefully allies in the
long struggle for progressive change and peace and justice.
As an example of foreign policy issues that local electoral runs should stay
away from, I do not believe that zeroing in on the middle east war between
Israelis and Palestinians can be helpful in a local or statewide run for
office. Moreover, I would not be involved in a local campaign that focused on such
a divisive issue.Many left-liberals,many Green Rainbow Party members, and
many of the young and newcomers to politics are vastly uninformed of the
progressive policies of such Jewish groups as Tikkun ,Brit Tzedek, Peace Now and the
Israeli Left, who have championed the rights of Palestinians.
In certain circles of progressive politics,there is a demonizing of Israel,
and by implication Jews who live there, a position which I have come out in
public as being opposed to.With all its faults, there is the modicum of
opposition in Israeli society and the veneer of a democratic culture, utterly lacking
in surrounding countries in the middle east.This of course in no way excuses
the present non-humanitarian treatment of Palestinians by the Sharon
Government.And as a dyed in the wool Socialist, I do not support that government in any
respect. Similar to the anti-war movement elsewhere in the West, there is a
progressive movement of Jews in Israel who advocate peace as well as justice
for the Palestinians. But a short note such as this one can not possibly touch
all the bases regarding the protracted armed struggle. Much blood and print
has been spilled struggling over the issues and it is a vastly complicated one,
which local campaigns step into at their peril.
At the same time, many progressives are involved with protesting the Patriot
Act and with protecting the civil liberties of Muslims,and Arab Americans.Such
efforts seem perfectly supportable and it may be a question of common sense
or fine tuning. I suggest that at this stage,the strength or weakness of the
Green Rainbow Party in Watertown will be its ability to integrate diverse view
points and come up with a common program that will appeal across the
board.Lacking such ability, the GRP seems destined to remain a small fringe grouping.
Paul Wernick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.green-rainbow.org/pipermail/wb-discuss/attachments/20031115/d981cd19/attachment.htm
More information about the WB-Discuss
mailing list