- Jan 8th, (four weeks beforehand) - Proposal submissions due.
- February 2nd, 9 am Comments and Vetting Close.
- Februrary 3rd, 9 am Amendments Close.
- February 4th, 9 pm Rankings Close.
Please enter your proposals below, including:
PROPOSAL HEADER AND PREAMBLE
- TITLE: [Provide a short, descriptive title for the proposal.]
- SPONSORS: [List the sponsors of the proposal. Proposals must be sponsored by two StateCom members or a local chapter.]
- VETTING COMMITTEES: [List the working committees that the sponsor feels are relevant to the vetting of this proposal.]
- FLOOR MANAGER: [List the name and contact information for one person who will manage the process for this proposal. This person will be the single point of contact for receiving comments on the proposal and providing decisions such as whether to accept a friendly amendment. They must be in attendance at the StateCom meeting when the proposal is under consideration.]
- SHEPHERD: List one person who will serve as “shepherd” to monitor the implementation of the proposal after it is adopted.
- SUMMARY: [Provide a short (40 word) summary of the purpose and implications of the proposal.]
- BACKGROUND: [Provide the basic background on the proposal. What will it accomplish? Why is it written with these particular provisions? Is it critical that it be adopted?]
- TEXT OF PROPOSAL: [Provide the exact text that will be implemented if StateCom adopts the proposal. If funds are being appropriated, specify that here. Note that text that appears elsewhere in the proposal will NOT be officially adopted when StateCom votes on the proposal.]
- IMPLEMENTATION: [List the persons or committees that must act to implement the proposal. What do they have to do and what are their deadlines for action? This helps StateCom assess whether the party has the staff and volunteer resources to implement the proposal. It also alerts those persons who will be asked to act if the proposal is adopted. ]]
- FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: [Describe the impacts on GRP budgeting that are expected from this proposal. Estimate total expenses or income expected from adoption of the proposal. If this proposal will be funded through an item that it already in the GRP budget, so note. Note that any appropriation required by this proposal must be included in the TEXT OF PROPOSAL section.]
- REFERENCES AND ATTACHMENTS: [Provide references (with hyperlinks if possible) that assist StateCom in understanding and evaluating the proposal. Attach any additional explanatory information here as numbered attachment sections.]
Enter the Proposal Header and Preamble here (then a second text box will appear for entry of the rest of the proposal):
The Rights of Nature Sponsors: Maureen Doyle and Frank Jeffers from the Ecoaction Committee of GPUS and members of the MA GRP Vetting Committees: this needs to be voted on by the state committee of the GRP to be included in our charter. Floor manager: Maureen Doyle Shepard: Maureen Doyle Summary:"It is evident in conditions throughout the United States that our environmental regulatory system has failed to adequately protect our natural ecosystems upon which our health and lives depend. " The interfering with nature's regulatory system has allowed many environmental hazards that have caused health issues to humans , ecosystems, and other animals. The Green party needs to stand up and defend our life-giving nature. The GPUS accepted this document (see attached) into its platform in 2021. The state of Ma Green- Rainbow party , an affiliate of the Green Party, should endorse it and incorporate it as well . Here is a statement from Winona LaDuke, two-time Green Party vice presidential candidate, in her 2016 speech, “Native Rights and the Rights of Nature". "It logically follows that recognizing the rights of our domestic natural ecosystems is both correct and necessary to help safeguard a healthy future for all our communities, for our children and grandchildren. ...We need to transform from the rights of corporations to the rights of nature. It’s going to take a lot to change the system,” in her 2016 speech, “Native Rights and the Rights of Nature.” Background: The duopoly parties (Republican and Democrate) soley defend economic rights and see nature as something that humnas can use as they wish to achieve their economic goals. The Green Party is the only major party in the USA that stands for “people, peace, and planet” , defending nature as well bas the Earth's inhabitants. By endorsing this statement, the GRP accepts their role in protecting the planet that we all live on . Text of proposal: Rights of Nature We support the adoption of local, state, and federal laws which recognize the legal rights of natural communities and ecosystems - including wetlands, streams, rivers, aquifers, and other water systems - to exist, flourish, regenerate, naturally evolve, and be restored. We support the inclusion in those laws of the ability of people and communities to file legal actions in the name of the affected natural community or ecosystem, and for courts to require restoration of the natural community or ecosystem back to its pre-damaged state. IMPLEMENTATION: The statecommittee of the Green-Rainbow party needs to vote to accept this document and to add it to their charter. The Communications Committee can help publicize it. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: I don't believe their would be any costs involved in this implementation and adoption.[ REFERENCES AND ATTACHMENTS: [Please find enclosed two attachments: oje is a slideshow illustrating why we need this statement. The other is the complete Rights of Nature platform to the GPUS given by Ecoaction member Lizzie Adams. Rights of Nature Slideshow https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vTSY2jzboyXDey2amCfnYLs18RRs-n91byQn3xL8PLvX6ved9GOO9ODkCdmUP9bpcC7YO5DIKEaBi7Y/pub?start=true&loop=false&delayms=30000 EcoAction Committee’s GPUS Platform Proposal for Rights of Nature Addition https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTTNe7oJ9-noPXHLxgnGm2UIuVR95Ln_TdO_Vxi0kIoVSIgHAKsySOPXmnkvO6RI0ySu-_to8bYWGeo/pub
Sponsors: David Keil, Brian Cady
Co-sponsor: John Blumenstiel
BACKGROUND: The November 21 StateCom session initiated a process toward decertification of the GBC, but has not posted reasons yet. It also called for a meeting between GRP and GBC leaders to discuss building the GRP in Greater Boston. Since November 21, the GBC will have held two meetings, December 14 and January 11, allowing time for it to review the situation and to take corrective measures. After the December meeting, members proposed that the chapter temporarily replace its officers with a transition team or committee.
PROPOSAL: StateCom at its Feb. 5 meeting will review progress by the Greater Boston chapter in addressing the concerns that led to the decertification and communication processes initiated November 21. StateCom insists that chapters follow democratic procedures and hold officers accountable for doing the same. Name calling and disruption of meetings are inconsistent with democratic procedure. Chapters are expected to acknowledge GRP co-chairs' statements as statements of GRP policy and to organize efforts to build the GRP in their chapter areas, including around responses to the climate crisis. In accordance with a second decision it made 11/21/21, StateCom hereby establishes a temporary subcommittee to address building the GRP in greater Boston and looks forward to this subcommittee meeting with GBC members.